Philippines pushes PHP 1bn+ businesses onto Electronic Invoicing by 31 December 2026.
Cross it in 2024 sales and the BIR (Bureau of Internal Revenue) drags you onto a platform its own advisers say is not fully operational. Revenue Regulations 11-2025 and 26-2025 set the deadline at 31 December 2026 — nine months past 14 March, but no softer on the EIS (Electronic Invoicing System) API or the branch-by-TIN (Taxpayer Identification Number) rule.
01The pain
A Quezon City supermarket owner closed her 2024 books at PHP 1 billion (~$17M). She did not know what that number meant. She does now. Revenue Regulations 11-2025 and 26-2025, issued by the BIR under the CREATE MORE Act, push her and seven other taxpayer categories onto the EIS by 31 December 2026 — nine months past the original 14 March, after KPMG's Manila practice and Philippine retail trade associations told the regulator the schedule was unworkable. In scope: LTS (Large Taxpayers Service) registrants, e-commerce sellers, exporters, POS (point-of-sale) and CAS (computerised accounting system) users, anyone over PHP 1 billion in gross sales, tax-incentive holders, government suppliers.1
The branch rule bites hardest. Acclime's Manila office puts it in one line: if any single branch of a TIN is in scope, every branch must comply. A 40-store Cebu electronics chain with one tax-incentive subsidiary drags the rest through the gate. KPMG, Acclime and Sovos all flag the same readiness gap on the regulator's side; operators face a 9–12 month rebuild — ERP (enterprise resource planning) and POS systems reconfigured to emit JSON in the BIR schema, certificates wired into an unstable API, cybersecurity testing against a moving target. Penalties run three deep: monetary fines, suspension of operations, and disallowance of input VAT (value-added tax) credits — the last alone can wipe a year of margin off a grocery chain in one audit cycle.2,3,4
02Who solves this today
Three Philippine-active vendors that name BIR EIS readiness on their own homepage, not buried in a roadmap. Each verified live and self-marketed in this niche on the date of writing. The list is intentionally narrow.
Listed providers publicly market to the Philippine BIR EIS / Philippine e-invoicing / EIS API / CAS Permit-to-Use niche on their own homepages or canonical product pages. Inclusion is not endorsement. Adjacent Philippine-or-global e-invoicing vendors were considered and excluded where their public homepage did not explicitly name the BIR EIS / Philippine e-invoicing niche at the date of writing — Fonoa's homepage cites "150+ countries" but the Philippines is not named on the front page; Storecove's homepage names Singapore Peppol but not the Philippines; Avalara's PH e-invoicing landing page returned a 404 at the date of writing; Tradeshift's homepage cites "70 countries / 12 clearance countries" without naming the Philippines; SAP's SEA e-invoicing page returned 403; JuanTax's homepage markets "BIR-Accredited Tax Platform" but does not surface EIS as a product; Taxumo's homepage links to a "Digital Invoice" feature but the homepage itself does not name BIR EIS, and Taxumo's own e-invoicing explainer states "Taxumo's system isn't yet connected to the EIS"; Pagero redirects to thomsonreuters.com without naming the Philippines on the destination homepage. They were therefore dropped per the named-niche-on-homepage rule. The BIR EIS portal (eis.bir.gov.ph / eis-cert.bir.gov.ph) is the regulator's own platform and is cited above in section 01 as the source of the regime and the publisher of the platform itself, not as a third-party solution provider. KPMG, Acclime and Sovos are also cited in section 01 as advisory and trade-press sources; vendors can be both source and solution as long as the cited roles are clearly separate.
Report a mistake — or suggest a new solution
Spot a wrong number, dead source link, missing aspect, broken translation? Or know a vendor we should list as a solution? Tell us. The Director re-checks every report and either updates the page or writes back with a reason.
Got it — thank you.
The Director will look at your report on the next research cycle. If you left an email you'll hear back when we either update the page or decide it's not actionable (with a one-paragraph reason).
Listed companies — manage your entry. If anything here is wrong, missing, or out of date, or if you'd rather not be listed at all, write to us. We take entries down within 24 hours and fix corrections inside seven business days. We do not approach listed companies first; we publish what your own public marketing says and respond when you reach out. Email contact@aikraft.com.