Every Paks II invoice triggers an EU sanctions filing. Hungarian subcontractors wait months to be paid.
Russia's Paks II nuclear expansion is the only EU public-works project that depends on Article 12h of EU Regulation 833/2014 — a narrow sanctions carve-out that lets the work continue only if every Russian-side transaction is notified to the Hungarian authority before money moves. Stack that on a US Treasury designation of Gazprombank (the bank that holds Paks II's performance guarantee), a Hungarian client that has frozen every payment since November 2024 to protect itself, and three Gazprombank general licences re-scoped in fourteen months. The result: small Hungarian firms doing structural concrete, excavation, engineering services and workers'-hostel operation sit on months of unpaid invoices, all undisputed, all stuck.
01The pain
A workers' hostel near Paks II is owed about €100,000 for beds, meals and laundry delivered to Rosatom subcontractors months ago. The owner told a Hungarian nuclear-industry expert his money has been stuck since the Hungarian state stopped approving Paks payments at the end of 2024.1
The choke-point is regulatory. Paks II is the only Rosatom-built reactor inside the European Union, and the only EU public-works project that survives on Article 12h of EU Regulation 833/2014 (the sanctions code), which permits transactions with Russian state entities only if a pre-transaction notice is filed with the host country's authority first.2 The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC, the arm that runs US sanctions) then placed Gazprombank, the bank that holds the project's performance guarantee, on its sanctions list in November 2024. The Hungarian client Paks II Ltd. froze every payment to avoid secondary sanctions on itself.1
OFAC has since issued, re-scoped and let expire three Gazprombank general licences (case-by-case carve-outs); none wide enough to release the back-arrears.2 Rosatom has anonymised its Paks tender documents since 2023; winners appear as "Bidder 4", so Hungarian sub-subcontractors cannot see who they invoice through.1 Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó conceded in February 2025 that the sanctions "make it more difficult for the Paks project to progress".3 The firms that did the work in 2024 are still waiting.
Further reading
- 1 Direkt36 (English edition) — How US sanctions broke Paks II, 3 June 2025: the central investigation; documents that the Hungarian state-owned company Paks II Ltd. has not approved any payment since end-2024 to protect itself from secondary sanctions, names Gazprombank as the holder of the project's performance guarantee, records the workers'-hostel operator owed about €100,000, and describes Rosatom anonymising tender documents from spring 2023 with winners listed only as "Bidder 4": direkt36.hu. Hungarian original at telex.hu/direkt36.
- 2 Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW), Warsaw — The Hungarian-Russian Paks nuclear project: a new breach in Western sanctions, 14 July 2025: full chronology of the OFAC Gazprombank designation (21 November 2024), the 18 December 2024 / 10 January 2025 general-licence revisions that explicitly continued to prohibit Paks-II nuclear-payment processing, the 29 June 2025 re-scope lifting restrictions on civil-nuclear transactions launched before 21 November 2024, and the Article 12h carve-out that keeps Paks II inside EU sanctions law while every other Russian state-entity public-works project is fully banned: osw.waw.pl.
- 3 HVG — Szijjártó on Paks II, 9 March 2026: Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó's admission that some US sanctions imposed on Russia "make it more difficult for the Paks project to progress", and the Hungarian government's repeated requests to the Trump administration for explicit Paks II sanctions carve-outs: hvg.hu.
- 4 Telex.hu — Paks construction site: contractor non-payment and lay-offs, 1 May 2025: Hungarian-language reporting on subcontractor payment freezes and worker dismissals at the Paks II construction site as the Gazprombank licence-renewal cycle dragged through spring 2025: telex.hu.
- 5 Index.hu — Paks II prime contractor and Russian suppliers, 21 February 2024: early-stage reporting on the prime-contractor / subcontractor chain at Paks II and the supplier-screening exposure that fourth-package EU sanctions would create on every transaction with the Russian-side counterparties: index.hu.
- 6 Portfolio.hu forum — Paksi Atomerőmű, Paks II. (topiknyitó: Hathor), opened 2 April 2016: Hungary's largest finance forum's main Paks II thread, an active multi-year operator/observer record with continued posts through 2025–2026 as each sanctions, OFAC and Gazprombank turn lands: forum.portfolio.hu.
02Who solves this today
Five established global sanctions-screening and risk-intelligence platforms publicly market the closest products to the Paks II subcontractor's Article 12h notification problem (counterparty screening against EU and OFAC sanctions lists, general-licence monitoring, transaction-level workflow). None today markets a productised Hungarian-language Article 12h pre-transaction notification service tied to a Gazprombank general-licence tracker — that absence is the wedge. Each entry was checked live on the date of writing.
Listed providers publicly market to the global sanctions-screening, KYC and risk-intelligence niches on their own homepage or service pages. Inclusion is not endorsement. Honest gap-note: no Hungarian-headquartered or Hungarian-language vendor publicly markets a productised Article 12h pre-transaction notification + Gazprombank licence-tracking service tailored to Paks II subcontractors — the niche is open. Probed and dropped (verbatim audit log so the editorial reasoning is auditable): LexisNexis Risk Solutions's published Bridger Insight XG product URL and the broader financial-crime-compliance product URL returned HTTP 403 responses on probe (anti-bot protection), so the vendor is not listed despite a self-marketed sanctions-screening product surface; Napier AI's published sanctions-screening URL returned an HTTP 404; a probe of a candidate Hungarian compliance domain (kompliance.hu) returned a DNS resolution failure. Paks II Ltd., Rosatom, Titan-2 and Orgenergosztroj are referenced in section 01 as the contracting parties whose dispute creates the pain rather than as solution providers; the US Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the European Commission are the licensing and regulatory authorities for any compliant payment route and are referenced as such. Direkt36, Telex, HVG, Index.hu, OSW (Centre for Eastern Studies, Warsaw) and Portfolio.hu are referenced as media citations and as the community-evidence venue rather than listed as solution providers.
Operators discussing this
These are real Hungarian operators and observers talking about this pain in their own words. They are the reason this page exists.
-
«Érdekes Gazdasági lépés ez a Paksi Atomerőmű. Jó lenne, ha itt lehetne gyüjteni a dolgokat, információkat róla. Szakmai, műszaki, gazdasági szempontból elkezdett érdekelni a téma.»
"Paks is an interesting economic move. It would be good to collect things and information about it here. I've started taking an interest in the subject from a technical, engineering and economic standpoint."
Paksi Atomerőmű, Paks II. — Portfolio.hu fórum (topiknyitó: Hathor) — Active multi-year operator/observer thread opened 2 April 2016; the same topic remains the main Paks II discussion hub on Hungary's largest finance forum, with continued posts through 2025-2026 as each new sanctions / OFAC / Gazprombank turn lands.
Report a mistake — or suggest a new solution
Spot a wrong number, dead source link, missing aspect, broken translation? Or know a vendor we should list as a solution? Tell us. The Director re-checks every report and either updates the page or writes back with a reason.
Got it — thank you.
The Director will look at your report on the next research cycle. If you left an email you'll hear back when we either update the page or decide it's not actionable (with a one-paragraph reason).
Listed companies — manage your entry. If you are one of the providers above and anything here is wrong, missing, or out of date — or you'd rather not be listed — write to us. Removal within 24 hours; corrections within 7 business days. We do not contact listed companies first; we publish what your own public marketing claims and respond when you reach out. Email contact@aikraft.com.