לחץ העובדים הזרים בישראל: קבלנים מול שלילת רישיון.

02Who solves this today

Two Israeli law firms whose own practice pages explicitly market a foreign-worker / immigration practice serving employers — the closest existing professional-services answer to a PIBA enforcement notice. The wider Israeli HR-software and construction-ERP market has not yet packaged a foreign-worker compliance product on its public homepages, which is precisely the wedge in the third TL;DR bullet. Each entry was checked live on the date of writing. The list is intentionally narrow.

Listed providers publicly market to the Israeli foreign-worker / PIBA / construction-sector compliance niche on their own practice or product pages. Inclusion is not endorsement. Adjacent vendors and platforms were considered and excluded where their public homepage or feature pages did not explicitly name the niche at the date of writing — Hilan (hilan.co.il) returned HTTP 200 but its English homepage marketed payroll, HR, time-and-attendance, pensions and analytics with no mention of foreign workers, PIBA or work-permit features, so it was dropped; Michpal (michpal.co.il) returned HTTP 200 but markets payroll, pension and HR-portal products with no foreign-worker module, so it was dropped; Synel (synel.com) returned HTTP 500 on homepage probe, so it was dropped pending re-check; Niloosoft (niloosoft.com) returned HTTP 200 but markets a general recruitment and Human-Resources platform with no foreign-worker, PIBA or work-permit specialisation surfaced at homepage level, so it was dropped; Comblack (comblack.co.il) returned a TLS / certificate-name error on probe, so it was dropped pending re-check; Compass HR (compass-hr.co.il) returned ECONNREFUSED, so it was dropped pending re-check; Shiklarim (shiklarim.co.il) returned ECONNREFUSED, so it was dropped pending re-check; Priority Software (priority-software.com) returned HTTP 200 with a Construction industry-solution link but no foreign-worker compliance, PIBA reporting or visa-tracking content surfaced at homepage level, so it was dropped pending re-check; Sapiens (sapiens.com) returned HTTP 200 but markets insurance-software solutions only, so it was dropped as out-of-niche; Pearl Cohen (pearlcohen.com) returned HTTP 200 but the homepage and /practices page did not enumerate immigration, foreign-worker, PIBA, work-permit or construction-sector labour as distinct practice areas at the date of writing, so it was dropped pending re-check; Erdinast Ben Nathan (ebnlaw.co.il) returned HTTP 200 with Labor Law as a general practice but no immigration, foreign-worker or construction-sector labour subcategory surfaced at homepage level, so it was dropped pending re-check; Yigal Arnon (arnon.co.il) returned an expired TLS certificate on probe, so it was dropped pending re-check; Goldfarb (goldfarb.com) returned HTTP 403 on probe (anti-bot wall), so it was dropped pending re-check. The Population and Immigration Authority (PIBA) is referenced in section 01 as the regulator rather than listed as a third-party solution provider. Newland Chase, CWS Israel, the Jerusalem Post and Melamed Law are referenced in section 01 as practitioner / trade-press citations rather than listed as solution providers. The narrowness of the list — two Israeli law firms that publicly name the foreign-worker practice against a software pool that does not — is itself the structural opening: today the PIBA-compliance capability lives inside law-firm retainers priced for large contractors, not inside a productised compliance Software-as-a-Service sized for the mid-sized builder running thirty to a hundred foreign workers.